Handling the five most common objections

Objection 1: "I don't write that many checks anymore."

The most common objection, and the one that ends the most conversations prematurely. It's not an objection. It's a misunderstanding.

The reframe: "That actually makes Positive Pay more important, not less. Check fraud has stayed roughly flat for a decade. ACH fraud has surged. Our platform covers both, and most of our business clients use it primarily for ACH. When was the last time you reviewed every ACH debit hitting your account, line by line?"

They haven't. Nobody does. That's the opening.

Objection 2: "The fee is too high."

Business clients are fee-averse until they've experienced fraud. Then the fee looks small.

The reframe: "I understand. The fee is fixed and predictable. A single fraud incident isn't. One washed check or one fraudulent ACH file can cost more than years of the service. Most of our business clients tell us the same thing: they thought the fee was big until they had fraud, and then it wasn't."

If price is still the wall, consider bundling PP into a higher-tier business package so it reads as a service level, not a line-item fee.

Objection 3: "It's too much work to use."

The fear is another tool, another login, another daily task.

The reframe: "It's less work than you'd think, and far less than dealing with fraud after the fact. Exceptions come to you by text or email. You decision them from your phone in seconds. And you assign one person on your team to own it, so it's not everyone's job, it's one person's quick daily check."

Objection 4: "We don't really have fraud problems."

The reframe: "That's good, and it's also exactly when the smartest businesses add protection. Positive Pay isn't only about the fraud you've seen. It's about the fraud you haven't. Two out of three organizations experienced a payment fraud attempt last year. The businesses that add protection before an incident are the ones that never have the bad story to tell."

Objection 5: "Let me think about it."

Usually means there's no urgency and no internal owner.

The reframe: "Of course. One thing that helps: when would be a good time for me to check back? And in the meantime, who else on your team should be part of this decision?" That surfaces the real timeline and the real decision-makers, instead of leaving the conversation to drift.

Do this

Pick the objection your team hears most and practice the reframe out loud until it's natural. Then do the next one. When in doubt, lead with: "When's the last time you had check or ACH fraud?" The answer tells you which reframe to use.

What's next.

Lesson 3.4 gives you the email sequence for the business clients you can't reach by phone.

Self-check

3 quick questions

Why is "I don't write that many checks" the most important objection to get right?

A It's the rarest

B It ends the most conversations prematurely — and it's a misunderstanding, not a real objection

C It only comes from large businesses

D It's a pricing objection in disguise

Correct. It's the most common and the most mishandled. The reframe is simple: ACH fraud has surged, and PP covers both. 'When was the last time you reviewed every ACH debit line by line?'

Not quite. This objection ends the most conversations prematurely — and it's a misunderstanding, not a real objection. The reframe turns it into an ACH conversation.

What's the reframe for the fee objection?

A Offer a permanent discount

B The fee is fixed and predictable; a single fraud incident is neither

C Tell them everyone pays it

D Drop the conversation

Correct. Fixed and predictable vs. unpredictable and potentially large. Most clients change their mind after their first fraud incident.

Not quite. The reframe: the fee is fixed and predictable. A fraud incident is neither — and can cost more than years of the service.

What's the best universal opener when you're unsure which objection you're facing?

A "Can I send you a brochure?"

B "What's your budget?"

C "Have you heard of Positive Pay?"

D "When's the last time you had check or ACH fraud?"

Correct. The answer tells you which objection is actually at play and how urgent the conversation really is.

Not quite. 'When's the last time you had check or ACH fraud?' is the best universal opener — the answer tells you exactly which reframe to use.

← PreviousConversation starters and discovery questions Next lesson →The 3-email outreach sequence